Regulations 

Do the girls have logic? Women's logic. What is it? How to understand it? Especially for men

about LPOLKHTUE TSEOULPK MPZYLY RPVEDIM ZEOETBFPT UMKHYUBKOSHI YUYUEM. :-)
OBBCHBOYE DBOOPK UVBFSHY NOE RPDULBBMB VEUEDB U TSKHTOBMYUFLPK, LPFPTBS HUBUFCHHEF CH UYAENLBI RETEDBUY "UFP IPYUEF TSEOEYOB" OB FENBS "YEUEF TCEOEYOB" OB FENBS "YEZTEUELBUELBUY FETNYO "TSEOULBS MPZYLB" LPOEUOP TSE, RTYDKHNBO NKHTSYUYOBNY. mPZYLB OE NPTSEF VSCHFSH TSEOULPK YMY NKHTSULPK. MPZYLB - LFP MPZYLB. OP, ZPCHPTS P TSEOULPK MPZYLE, NKHTSYUYOSCH RPDTBKHNECHBAF OE PVYASUOYNPE U TBGYPOBMSHOPK RPYGYY RPCHEDEOYE TSEOEYOSCH, OERTEDULBKHENPUFSH RPUOULPH. rPUENH LFP FBL? h UIMKH UCHPEZP VYPMPZYUEULPZP UFTPEOIS, NSCH CHUE HUFTPEOSCH OE TBGYPOBMSHOP. MAVSCHN YUEMPCHELPN, CHTENS PF CHTENEOY, NPZHF THLPCHPDIFSH YUKHCHUFCHB, B OE TBKHN. pDOBLP TSEOEYOBN RTYTPDPDK VSCHMP RTEDOBYUEOP YUBEE, YUEN NKHTSYUYOSCH, UPCHETYBFSH OETBGYPOBMSHOSCHE, OERTEDULBKHENSHCHE DEKUFCHYS. FY DEKUFCHYS OE RPDDBAFUS PVSCHYUOPK MPZYLE, OP POI CHRPMOE RPOSFOSCH U LNPGYPOBMSHOPK RPYGY CHPORTYSFYS.

OERTEDULBKHENPUFSH RPCHEDEOYS SCHMSEFUS OEPVIPDYNSCHN LMENEOFFN HIBTSYCHBOYS. EUMY CHBY RBTFOET RTEDULBKHEN, CHSCH BTBOYE BOBEFE, UFP PO ULBTSEF J UDEMBEF CH FPK YMY YOPK UIFKHBGY, CHSCH VSCHUFTP FETSEFE L OENKH YOFETEU. pDOBLP, OERTEDULBKHENPUFSH, LPFPTBS RETEIMEUFSCHBEF YUETE LTBK, NPTSEF UPUDBCHBFSH RTPVMENSCH Y LPOZHMILFOSCHE UIFKHBGYY, LBL, OBRTUKHNET, CH UMED
h RTPGEUUE UENEKOPK FETBRY PDOK UKHRTKHTSEULPK RBTSCH, NKHTS TBUULBSCHCHBEF NOE PV PYUETEDOPN YOGIDEOFE, LPFPTSCHK RTPYSPYEM U EZP TSEOPK. SING AT LPNRBOYEK WIPDYMY CH TEUFPTBO. dPZPCHPTYMYUSH, UFP NKHTs RSHEF, B TSEOB OEF, FBL LBL RPFPN VHDEF CHEUFY NBYOKH. TSEOB CHUE-FBLY OENOPZP CHSCHRIMB, CH TEKHMSHFBFE YUEZP UEMB ЪB THMSH CH OEFTEECHPN UPUFFPSOY. YI POOFBOBCHMYCHBEF UPFTHDOIL Zyvdd, YUFPVSH RTPCHETYFSH DPLKHNEOFSCH, Y CHYDIF ЪB THMEN RSHSOHA TSEOEYOH. ON DEMBEF EK YBNEYUBOYE, ABOUT UFP ​​POB OBYUYOBEF CHP'NHEBFSHUS Y DPLBSCHBFSH, UFP NYMYGYPOET L OEK RTYDYTBEFUS. chNEUFP FPZP YUFPVSH RTYOBFSH UCHPA CHYOKH Y TEYYFSH RTPVMENKH NYTOSCHN RHFEN, VBRMBFYCH CHSFLKH, POB ZTHVIF NYMYGYPOETKH: “YUFP CHU LP NOE RTY! iPFIFE CHSFLH ЪБТБВПФБФШ? IPTPYP WITH DBN FEVE $ 100, AT FEVS ICHBFIF? ". rUME LFPZP POB VETEF TBUFETSCHYEZPUS PF FBLPK OBZMPUFY NIMYGYPOETB ЪB RPDVPTPDPL, RTIFSYCHBEF EZP L UEHE, FTERMEF RP EELE, RTEYSHBSPCHB? SFP FEVE OBDP? " NYMYGYPOET LTBUOEEF PF STUPFY, OYLBLYE DEOSHZY ENKH HTSE OE OKHTSOSCH. PO BSCHMSEF, UFP PFCHEEF EЈ CH PFDEMEOYE, UFPVSH DEMBFSH RTPVSH ABOUT BMLPZPMSH. NKHTs, CHYDS, UFP CHUE NPTSEF PYUEOSH RMPIP YBLPOYUIFUS, RSCHFBEFUS HURPLPYFSH TBBYPYEDYHAUS TSEOKH Y NYMYGYPOETB, LPFPTSCHK CH OUFEOSHYHYUPEKH. PO PFSCHCHBEF UVTBTSB RPTSDLB CH UVPTPOKH, ZPCHPTYF: CHYDYYSH POB OE CH UEVE. VTBFPL, FSH NEOS RPOINBEISH? " UHEF ENKH DEOSHZY Y RTPUIF PFRKHUFIFSH TSEOH, RTEDMBZBEF NYTOP TBPKFYUSH. u FTHDPN, HURPLPYCH NYMYGYPOETB, PO RPFPN U HTSBUPN DHNBEF P TSEOE, LPFPTBS CH DPTPZPK YKHVE, U VPMSHYPK UKHNNPK DEOEZ CH LBTNWEUKH PFZMBUH.
lPZDB NKHTs URTBYCHBEF TSEOKH P FPN, RPYUENKH POB CHEMB UEVS RPDPVOSCHN PVTBSPN, POB PVYASUOSEF ENKH, UFP NYMYGYPOET L OEK RTYDYTBMUSHRT YHKHEPHEM OUTPUK CHEDSH POB CHSCHRIMB FP UPCHUEN YUHFSH-YUHFSH. URKHUFS LBLPE-FP CHTENS POB CHUE TCE UPZMBUIMBUSH, UFP VSCHMB OE RTBCHB CH'FPK UIFKHBGYY.
n TSEOULPK MPZYLE IPDIF NOPZP YHFPL Y BOELDPFPCH:
ЗПФПЧМА РЫТПЗ. NEW OKHTSOP 6 UVBLBOPCH NHLY.
dPUFFBA RBLEF U NHLPK Y CHYTSKH, UFP CH OBMYUY NBLUINKHN 2 UFBLBOB.
pFCHEF RTYYEM NPMOYEOPUOP J LBL-FP UBN UPVPK: b EUMY CHSFSH NBMEOSHLYK UFBLBOYUIL?

HIPDS ABOUT TBVPFH, NKHTs OEULPMSHLP TB ZTPNLP Y CHOSFOP ULBBM: "nPVYMSHOIL ABVSCHM YBTSDYFSH, PUFBCHMSA EZP DPNB".
vHLCHBMSHOP YUETE YUBU CHURPNYOBA, UFP X OBU U OYN CHBTSOBS CHUFTEYUB, B PO LFPZP OE JOBEF.
nSCHUMSH RETCHBS - UTPYUOP RPCHPOYFSH ENH ABOUT NPVYMSHOIL!
nSCHUMSH CHFPTBS - FBL NPVYMSHOIL, ChPF PO, TBTSTSEOOSCHK METZIF ...
nSCHUMSH FTEFSHS, J ЪBLMAYUYFEMSHOBS, B S UEKYUBU EZP ЪBTSTSKH Y URPLPKOP RPCHPOA !!!

chPCHTBFYMBUSH NPS TSEOB U PYUETEDOPK OEHDBYUOPK RPRSCHFLY UDBFSH
"VEURMBFOP" CHPDYFEMSHULIK LBNEO CH ntp.
eUFEUFCHEOOOP, OBYUYOBAFUS TBUURTPUSCH: UFP, LBL, DB RPYUENH ...
h YUYUME RTPYUYI J FBLPK CHRTPU: “b ABOUT LBLPK NBYOE-FP FSh UDBCHBMB?”.
CHBTSOSCHK CHRTPU, PF NBYYOSCH NOPZPE YBCHYUIF, DBTSE LPZDB FSCH OE YUBKOIL.
chPF PFChF FPMShLP, LBLPK VShch ChSch RPDKHNBMY? OB "RSFETLE", "UENETLE",
"LPREKLE"? oE-B, "ABOUT yee-me-opk" !!!

jFBL, TSEOULBS MPZYLB THLPCHPDUFCHKHEFUS YUHCHUFCHBNY. yuFPVSH RPOSFSH TSEOEYOKH, DHNBKFE, PUOPCHSCHBAUSH ABOUT YUKHCHUFCHBI, YOFKHYGY, B OE ABOUT PVSCHYUOPK MPZYLE. YUKHUFCHB ЪBUFBCHMSAF TSEOEYOKH DEKUFCHPCHBFSH YNRKHMSHUYCHOP, YUBUFP, OE ЪBDKHNSCHBSUSH P RPUMEDUFCHYSI UPDESOOPZP… lBBBMPUSH VSCH, OHMSCHYUCHYUCHYU About UFP TBUYUYUIFSCHBEN? h OBYUBME TPNBOB U TCEOBFSCHN YUEMPCHELPN CHBU CHUE CHTPDE VSH HUFTBYCHBEF: GCHEFSCH, LPNRMYNEOFSCH, CHOINBOYE, ABVPFB. rPFPN PLBSCHCHBEFUS, YUFP FB BVPFB J CHOYNBOYE RPDYUYOSAFUS EZP UFTPZPNH TBURPTSDLH DOS: At 9 HFTB DP 6 CHEYUETB IN ON TBVPFE, RPFPN 3 - 4 YUBUB have CHBNY, B DBMSHYE IN PFRTBCHMSEFUS A TSEOE TBUULBSCHCHBFSH PV PYUETEDOPK "BRBTLE" ON TBVPFE, P FPN, LBL ON HUFBM, B CHCHCHIPDOSCHE EZP TsDEF "LPNBODYTPCHLB". fBL CHSCH TSYCHFE OEULPMSHLP MEF, FP, TSCHDBS PF PFYUBSOSHS, LPZDB PO OE RTYIPDIF Y OE YCHPOIF, FP, RTPLMYOBS EZP, LPZDB PO RTYFIPBUTPUFF YP h LPOGE LPOGPCH, EUMY CHBN OE HDBEFUS TBCHEUFY EZP, BL OBIPDYFE UEVE UYNRBFYYUOPZP RBTOS, CHDSCHIBEFE REYUBMSHOP P TSEOBFPN MAVPCHOYLE J RPFPN DHNBEFE "op YUEZP TBDY C YUFTBFYMB ON OEZP UFPMSHLP CHTENEOY. CHESH AT UBNPZP OBYUBMB VSCHMP RPOSFOP, YUEN CHUE VBLPOYUIFUS ... ". chP'NPTSEO Y DTHZPK CHBTYBOF: CHCH PFVYCHBEFE EZP X TSEOSCH, OP FPZDB CHBU RPDTSYDBAF DTHZIE RTPVMENSCH. EUMY TSEOB PLBTSEFUS NUFYFESHOPK RP OBFKHTE: POB VHDEF Y'CHPDYFSH CHBU ЪCHPOLBNY Y RTYIPDBNY L CHBN DPNPK, VKHDEF RPRTELBFSH VSCHCHCHYBESHENTPN NKHTS VKHDEF NEFBFSHUS NETSDKH VSCHCHYEK UENSHEK Y OSCHOOYOEK, TBTSCHCHBSUSH ABOUT YUBUFY. rPFPN IN PRTEDEMYFUS, zde TSYFSH, TH OF LBLPE-OP CHTENS Chueh "HUFBLBOYFUS" DP FEI RPT, RPLB BL OE HOBEFE RP OBUFPSEENH YUEMPCHELB, P LPFPTPN NEYUFBMY UFPMSHLP MEF ... chEDSh RTYIPDSEYK MAVPCHOYL, FP UPCHUEN OE AF YUFP NHTS, P OEDPUFBFLBI LPFPTPZP ChBU RTEDKHRTESDBMB EZP VSCHCHYBS UKHRTKHZB.

yFBL, NPK UBKF VHLCHBMSHOP YBCHBMEO RETERYULPK U RPDPVOSCHNY YUFPTYSNY. NPCEF VSCHFSH, MAVPCHOSCHE FTEKHZPMSHOYLY ChP'OILBAF VMBZPDBTS "TSEOULPK MPZYLE"? iPFS, OKHTSOP PFDBFSH DPMTSOPE NKHTSYUYOBN, LPFPTSCHE FPTSE RETYPDYUEULY UVTBDBAF YFPK VPME'OSHA: “with RPMAVIM NPMPDHA DECHKHYLCH, FERETSH OEB. DEFEK TsBMLP ". LPOEUOP TCE, CH TEKHMSHFBFE LFYI OEBRTPZTBNNYTPCHBOOSHI MPZYLPK MAVPCHOSHI HUFTENMEOIK, UVTBDBAF FPMSHLP DEFY. LFP ULBBM, SFP "USCHO ЪB PFGB OE PFCEYUBEF"?
lPZDB CHLMAYUBEFUS OBY TBKHN, Y NSCh DBCHYN ABOUT FPTNPBB OBYY YNPGYK, FP U HCBUPN PVPTECHBEN RMPDSCH UCHPYI YUKHCHUFCH: YURPTYUEEBOOSCHE PFOPYP. OP, CHEDSH EUMY VSCHUE VSCHMP RPOSFOP Y URMBOYTPCHBOP ЪBTBOYE OBYEK MPZYLPK, OBCHETOPE, TSYЪOSH VSCHMB VSCH OE FBLPK YOFETEUOPK ...
TSEOEYOSCH RTEDRPYUIFBAF, YUFPVSH NKHTSYUYOSCH YUIFBMY YI TSEMBOYS RP ZMBBN. rPFPNKH UFP YBYUBUFHA UBNY UZHPTNKHMYTPCHBFSH UCHPY TSEMBOYS POI OE CH UPUFSOYY.
nKhTSULBS MPZYLB - LFP LPZDB RHFEN GERPULI RPUMEDPCHBFEMSHOSHI KNPBLMAYUEOIK
NSCh NPTSEN DPVIFSHUS LBLPK-FP CHRPMOE PRTEDEMEOOPK GEMEY.
b TSEOULBS - LFP LPZDB U RPNPESHA BVUHTDOSHI YUNSCHYMEOIK NSC OBIPDYN RETCHPE
RPRBCHYEEUS TEEEOYE Y PVYASCHMSEN EZP UNSCHUMPN OYYI KHUFTENMEOIK.
TSEOEIOB LFP LBL PFLTSCHFBS LOISB ABOUT LIFBKULPN SSCHLE, CHTPDE VSCH CHUE CH OEK CHYDOP Y SPTSOP RTPYUIFBFSH, OP BVUPMAFOP OYUEZP OERPOSFOP.
nBFENBFYUEEULHA MPZYLH YHYUBAF PDJO ZPD. TSEOULKHA - CHUA TSY'OSH.
yuFPVSH NKHTSUYOBN OBKHYUIFSHUS RPOINBFSH TSEOEYO, YN OKHTSOP OBKHYUIFSHUS RPOINBFSH NPFYCHSCH UPVUFCHOOSHI RPUFHRLPCH, PUOPCHBOOSHI OBNEPGYBSI.
P. S. rTPYKH HYUEUFSH, UFP ЬFKH UFBFSHA RYUBMB CEOEYOB.

LPNNEOFBTYECH OEF.

Men write off ridiculous actions on female logic, but for us women there is nothing special about it, because it is simply difficult for men to understand our subtle female nature. Why do we buy an extra pair of shoes or another jar of nail polish, really oh

Men write off ridiculous actions on female logic, but for us women there is nothing special about it, because it is simply difficult for men to understand our subtle female nature. Why do we buy an extra pair of shoes or another jar of nail polish, do they really think that we are thrifty. Of course, if that happy day of meeting with the prince of our life comes, and we have a rainy day, because the varnish has run out, the tights are torn, but this should not be.


Our right hemisphere, which is guided by women, is responsible for emotions, men live at the behest of nature behind the left hemisphere, which gave them the rationality of thought. But women are lucky in this regard, because we can simultaneously turn on two hemispheres of the brain, so we do several things at the same time (cook soup, change diapers, play with the baby, wash clothes, communicate with friends online). And for men, everything is in turn, first chemistry, and then football on the street.


The thinking of a woman differs from that of a man in that the stronger sex immediately gives a clear answer "yes" or "no", and the weaker sex is characterized by "possible". For a woman always relies on her intuition and emotions, and men build their logical chains, fighting for their place under the sun.


Take a business woman, for example. Any person, going to a business meeting, begins to carefully prepare for it in advance. Necessarily thinks through all pros and cons in advance and is 100% sure that he will win, sign a contract, etc. And a woman can easily be late or not come at all for no apparent reason, thereby confusing any man, which, as a result, will give many advantages.

Women's logic still exists, but who is to blame that men cannot understand it. They make up jokes about our logic, of course, for a man it's better than admitting defeat, just making fun of us. A woman should be respected, without us it will be so monotonous in this world. Our logic is not subject to any analytical actions, but still you men need it.

Logic is one of the most ancient subjects, standing next to philosophy and sociology and being an essential general cultural phenomenon from the very beginning of its emergence. The role of this science in the modern world is important and multifaceted. Those who possess knowledge in this area can conquer the whole world. It was believed that this is the only science capable of finding compromise solutions in any situation. Many scientists attribute the discipline to others, but in turn, refute this possibility.

Naturally, over time, the orientation of logical research changes, methods are improved and new trends appear that meet scientific and technical requirements. This is necessary because every year society faces new problems that cannot be solved with outdated methods. The subject of logic studies the thinking of a person from the side of those laws that he uses in the process of knowing the truth. In fact, since the discipline we are considering is very multifaceted, it is studied using several methods. Let's take a look at them.

Etymology of logic

Etymology is a branch of linguistics, the main purpose of which is the origin of a word, its study from the point of view of semantics (meaning). "Logos" in translation from Greek means "word", "thought", "knowledge". Thus, we can say that logic is a subject that studies thinking (reasoning). However, psychology, philosophy and physiology of nervous activity, in one way or another, also study thinking, but can we say that these sciences study the same thing? Rather, the opposite is true - in a sense, they are opposite. The difference between these sciences is the way of thinking. Ancient philosophers believed that a person's thinking is diverse, because he is able to analyze situations and create an algorithm for performing certain tasks to achieve a specific goal. For example, philosophy as a subject is rather just a discussion about life, about the meaning of being, while logic, in addition to idle reflections, leads to a certain result.

Reference method

Let's try to refer to dictionaries. Here the meaning of this term is somewhat different. From the point of view of the authors of encyclopedias, logic is a subject that studies the laws and forms of human thinking from the surrounding reality. This science is interested in how “living” true knowledge functions, and in search of answers to their questions, scientists do not turn to each specific case, but are guided by special rules and laws of thinking. The main task of logic as a science of thinking is to take into account only the method of obtaining new knowledge in the process of cognizing the surrounding world, without associating its form with a specific content.

The principle of logic

The subject and meaning of logic is best seen through a concrete example. Let's take two statements from different fields of science.

  1. “All stars have their own radiation. The sun is a star. It has its own radiation. "
  2. Any witness must tell the truth. My friend is a witness. My friend is obliged to tell the truth.

If you analyze it, you can see that in each of them two reasoning explains the third. Although each of the examples belongs to different areas of knowledge, the way in which the constituent parts of the content are related in each of them is the same. Namely: if an object has a certain property, then everything that concerns this quality has a different property. Result: The item in question also has this second property. These causal relationships are commonly called logic. This relationship can be observed in many life situations.

Let's turn to history

To understand the true meaning of this science, you need to know how and under what circumstances it arose. It turns out that the subject of logic as a science arose in several countries almost simultaneously: in Ancient India, in Ancient China and in Ancient Greece. If we talk about Greece, then this science arose during the disintegration of the clan system and the formation of such strata of the population as merchants, landowners and artisans. Those who ruled Greece infringed on the interests of almost all segments of the population, and the Greeks actively began to express their positions. In order to resolve the conflict peacefully, each side used its own arguments and arguments. This gave impetus to the development of such a science as logic. The subject was used very actively, because it was very important to win the discussions in order to influence decision-making.

In ancient China, logic arose during the golden age of Chinese philosophy, or, as it was also called, the period of "struggling states." Similar to the situation in Ancient Greece, there was also a struggle between the wealthy strata of the population and the authorities. The first wanted to change the structure of the state and abolish the transfer of power by hereditary means. During such a struggle, in order to win, it was necessary to gather around him as many supporters as possible. However, if in Ancient Greece this served as an additional incentive for the development of logic, then in Ancient China it was quite the opposite. After the Qin kingdom nevertheless became dominant, and the so-called cultural revolution took place, the development of logic at this stage

e stopped.

Considering that in different countries this science arose precisely during the period of struggle, the subject and meaning of logic can be characterized as follows: it is the science of the sequence of human thinking, which can positively influence the solution of conflict situations and disputes.

The main subject of logic

It is difficult to single out one definite meaning that would generally characterize such an ancient science. For example, the subject of logic is the study of the laws of deriving correct certain judgments and statements from certain true circumstances. This is how Friedrich Ludwig Gottlob Frege characterized this ancient science. The concept and subject of logic was also studied by Andrei Nikolaevich Schuman, a well-known modern logician. He believed that it was the science of thinking, which explores different ways of thinking and models them. In addition, the object and subject of logic is, of course, speech, because logic is carried out only through conversation or discussion, and it does not matter at all whether aloud or "inwardly."

The above statements indicate that the subject of the science of logic is the structure of thinking and its various properties that separate the sphere of abstract-logical, rational thinking - forms of thinking, laws, the necessary relationships between structural elements and the correctness of thinking to achieve truth.

The process of seeking truth

In simple terms, logic is a mental process of the search for truth, because on the basis of its principles, the process of the search for scientific knowledge is formed. There are various forms and methods of using logic, and they are all combined into a theory of the derivation of knowledge in various fields of science. This is the so-called traditional logic, within which there are more than 10 different methods, but the main ones are still the deductive logic of Descartes and the inductive logic of Bacon.

Deductive logic

We all know the deduction method. Its use is somehow connected with such science as logic. The subject of Descartes' logic is a method of scientific knowledge, the essence of which lies in the strict derivation of new ones from certain provisions that were previously studied and proved. He was able to explain why, since the initial statements are true, then the derived ones are also true.

For deductive logic, it is very important that there are no contradictions in the initial statements, since later they can lead to incorrect conclusions. Deductive logic is very precise and does not tolerate assumptions. All postulates that are used are usually based on verified data. This one has the power of persuasion and is used, as a rule, in the exact sciences such as mathematics. Moreover, the very method of finding the truth is not being questioned, but the very method of finding the truth is being studied. For example, the well-known Pythagorean theorem. How can you question its correctness? Rather, on the contrary, it is necessary to learn a theorem and learn how to prove it. The subject "Logic" studies exactly this direction. With its help, with knowledge of certain laws and properties of an object, it becomes possible to derive new ones.

Inductive logic

We can say that the so-called inductive logic of Bacon practically contradicts the basic principles of deductive. If the previous method is used for exact sciences, then this one is for natural ones, in which logic is needed. The subject of logic in such sciences: knowledge is obtained through observation and experiment. There is no place for precise data and calculations. All calculations are made only purely theoretically, with the aim of studying an object or phenomenon. The essence of inductive logic is as follows:

  1. Carry out constant observation of the object that is being investigated and create an artificial situation that could arise purely theoretically. This is necessary to study the properties of certain objects that cannot be learned in natural conditions. This is a prerequisite for learning inductive logic.
  2. Based on observations, collect as many facts as possible about the object under study. It is very important to note that since the conditions were created artificially, the facts can be distorted, but this does not mean that they are false.
  3. Summarize and systematize the data obtained during the experiments. This is necessary to assess the situation that has arisen. If the data turns out to be insufficient, then the phenomenon or object must be placed again in another artificial situation.
  4. Create a theory to explain the data obtained and predict their further development. This is the final stage, which serves to summarize. The theory can be formulated without taking into account the actual data obtained, however, it will nevertheless be accurate.

For example, on the basis of empirical research on natural phenomena, oscillations of sound, light, waves, etc., physicists have formulated the proposition that any phenomenon of a periodic nature can be measured. Of course, for each phenomenon, separate conditions were created and certain calculations were carried out. Depending on the complexity of the artificial situation, the readings varied significantly. This is what made it possible to prove that the periodicity of the oscillation can be measured. Bacon explained scientific induction as a method of scientific knowledge of cause-and-effect relationships and a method of scientific discovery.

Causal relationship

From the very beginning of the development of the science of logic, much attention was paid to this very factor, which affects the entire process of research. Causality is a very important aspect in the learning process of logic. A reason is a certain event or object (1), which naturally influences the emergence of another object or phenomenon (2). The subject of the science of logic, formally speaking, is to find out the reasons for this sequence. Indeed, from the above, it turns out that (1) is the cause of (2).

An example can be given: scientists who study outer space and objects that are there have discovered the phenomenon of a "black hole". This is a kind of cosmic body, the gravitational field of which is so great that it is capable of absorbing any other object in space. Now let's find out the cause-and-effect relationship of this phenomenon: if any cosmic body is very large: (1), then it is capable of absorbing any other (2).

Basic methods of logic

The subject of logic briefly studies many areas of life, but in most cases the information obtained depends on the logical method. For example, analysis is called the figurative division of the object under study into certain parts, in order to study its properties. Analysis, as a rule, is necessarily associated with synthesis. If the first method divides the phenomenon, then the second, on the contrary, connects the received parts to establish a relationship between them.

Another interesting subject of logic is the abstraction method. This is the process of mentally separating certain properties of an object or phenomenon in order to study them. All these techniques can be classified as cognitive methods.

There is also a method of interpretation, which consists in the knowledge of the sign system of certain objects. Thus, objects and phenomena can be given a symbolic meaning that will facilitate understanding of the essence of the object itself.

Modern logic

Modern logic is not a teaching, but a reflection of the world. As a rule, this science has two periods of formation. The first begins in the Ancient World (Ancient Greece, Ancient India, Ancient China) and ends in the 19th century. The second period begins in the second half of the 19th century and continues to this day. Philosophers and scientists of our time do not stop studying this ancient science. It would seem that all its methods and principles have long been studied by Aristotle and his followers, but every year logic as a science, a subject of logic, as well as its features continue to be studied.

One of the features of modern logic is the spread of the subject of research, which is due to new types and ways of thinking. This led to the emergence of such new types of modal logic as logic of change and causal logic. It has been proven that such models differ significantly from those already studied.

Modern logic as a science is used in many spheres of life, such as engineering and information technology. For example, if you look at how a computer works and works, you can find out that all programs on it are executed using an algorithm, where logic is involved in one way or another. In other words, we can say that the scientific process has reached that level of development where devices and mechanisms operating on logical principles are successfully created and put into operation.

Another example of the use of logic in modern science is control programs in CNC machines and installations. Here, too, a seemingly iron robot performs logical actions. However, such examples only formally show us the development of modern logic, because such a way of thinking can only be possessed by a living being, such as a person. Moreover, many scientists are still debating whether animals can have logical skills. All research in this area boils down to the fact that the principle of action of animals is based only on their instincts. Only a person can receive information, process it and give the result.

Research in the field of such a science as logic may continue for thousands of years, because the human brain has not been thoroughly studied. Every year people are born more and more developed, which indicates the continuing evolution of man.

They say you can't argue with a woman. You can, if you understand how women's logic works, which is not alien to regularity.

"The floor of the brain"

Women's logic, which used to mean "complete absence of logic", has received a scientific explanation today. It turned out that the female brain is inferior in size to the male, but much more complexly organized. According to an expert at the Goethe University in Frankfurt, Eileen Luders, there are more convolutions in the female brain and they are deeper than in the male. Hence, according to Eileen, women have a higher ability to think, but not to be straightforward, as in men, but to be "winding."

This is where the roots of female logic grow. A woman is able to perceive and analyze at the same time more information, more details, so her options for the development of events are much more diverse. So much so that a man whose logic is focused on a particular judgment ceases to see the connection between cause and effect, and the conclusion seems illogical to him. As Turgenev said:

"For feminine logic, twice two is a stearin candle."

Hidden details

Hypothetical situation: a young lady walks with the duke in the garden. Suddenly, she turns to her interlocutor and asks him to tie a lace on her boot. The Duke is confused:
- But he's tied up. He says
- Silly. - the lady answers him.
The Duke is surprised and offended:
What did I do to deserve this attitude? He asks.
- Leave me!
And the duke leaves, complaining of the vagaries and imperfections of the female sex. The lady is also incredibly upset by the behavior of her beau. Why? The Duke took the lady's hint literally. Analyzing her request, he forgot about three "golden questions" that need to be answered in order for the lady to understand:

1) What did the lady say?
2) What did the lady want to say?
3) What did she actually say?

That is, her immediate words; the information she wanted to convey and, roughly speaking, how her words influenced others. Let's explain the situation to the dull Duke. Suppose a lady, for some reason, in order to cause envy or to be convinced of the gentleman's attentiveness, wanted him to look after her. But do not tell him about it directly. So she "asked" to draw attention to herself. According to her scenario, the duke was to take the chance to demonstrate his affection. But in accordance with male logic, he clearly answered her request. Indeed, why tie the lace if it is already tied. The last hint was also misunderstood when the lady once again gave the duke a chance to show feelings, going against her obstinate decision. But the duke again took the hint literally and left her, thereby making the situation worse.

The last word

Feminine logic is designed to win arguments. Even when a woman has no more arguments, she can still win. How does this happen? According to one of the main postulates of female logic, identified by a professor at MIPT, Beklemishev:

a statement without objection is proven.

Even if the interlocutor decided to end the dispute due to its meaninglessness. If a woman said the last word, she won.

Moreover, the last word may not be an argument. The most fundamental words can be refuted by a simple phrase: "So what?" or "I don't remember that." For a lady, it is not the content of the answer that is important, but its very fact.

Cleopatra's turn

The wife of logic has many tricks to leave an opponent with nothing. Professor Dmitry Beklemishev mentions the logical figure "Cleopatra's turn", which, most likely, was used long before the birth of the last queen of Egypt. Its essence is to demand confirmation by example, and then accuse of pettiness. If this example turned out to be significant and the woman cannot refute it, then another law follows: “the exception proves the rule”. And women's logic wins again until the next argument against.

Many men should be familiar with the situation when a woman reproaches them for the lack of gifts or flowers. Imagine the following dialogue:

Wife to husband: You don't care about me, and in general, you haven't even given me flowers lately, let alone gifts! (Accusation) Husband: But what about the perfume that I gave you a month ago (Counterexample) Wife: I don't remember that, but even if you give me some little thing once a year, is it really a concern! (Example rejected)

So, by provocation and belittling of value, female logic again triumphs over male logic.

The magical power of repetitions

The more, the better - this is another truth of female logic. If in male logic the evidential power of an argument does not change when it is repeated, then in the case of female logic, the more often the argument is repeated, the more solid it is. Only one meaning should be conveyed by new verbal expressions each time, otherwise it will be quickly rejected: "Here's the same thing." For example, for a man it will be enough to say once that a certain N is a type that cannot be trusted. According to feminine logic, once is not enough to produce the desired effect. Thus, Mr. N will be called bad, hypocritical, untrustworthy, untrustworthy, and so on. Only after that, the female logic will consider that her thought is heard.

Acceptance of disclaimer

It happens, and often happens, that women are "pinned against the wall" during an argument. These arguments cannot be refuted, there is nothing to say, but it is necessary to say, otherwise, defeat. What to do in this case? To agree is to proudly surrender and attack from the rear. During a dispute, when a person's opinion is agreed against long discussions, he has nothing to argue or insist on. And then a counterblow is made by switching to another plane of conversation, an example that has nothing to do with the dispute, but is important:

"Yes, I know that I am a useless mother, but you always think only of yourself!"

Now the opponent will have to defend himself, proving that everything is wrong, and the thread of the original dispute will be lost.

Female absolute

In trying to prove something to a woman, you need to remember one more rule. In male logic, there are two kinds of judgment: true and false. Women's logic has three: true, false and uninteresting. And any woman, without a shadow of a doubt, easily and confidently classifies any statement into one of these three classes. For a man, such a choice will look like a "random number generator", but it also obeys a certain law.

Oddly enough, women's logic has an absolute - a certain set of statements that is convenient or interesting for a woman. Comparing with him, a woman determines whether to agree with the opponent's side, to contradict her or to nullify the dispute. So, a statement is true if it agrees with the absolute, false if it contradicts it, and is not worth attention if it has nothing to do with it. At the same time, if a man's false statement implies that the consequence, respectively, is also false, then in female logic the belief can be false, and the consequence is true. A simple example: if you say to a woman “science does not prove that a person has no soul,” this will be met with indifference - the statement is general and has nothing to do with the absolute. But if we say that science does not prove that a woman has a soul, this will already contradict the absolute and be perceived falsely. Although, the second statement is a consequence of the first.

And yet, there is no "absolute absolute" in women's logic. It is different for every woman and can constantly change. A lady with a stable absolute is called a “lady with convictions”.

Women's logic is a conventional name for more emotional thinking inherent in the female sex, which is opposed to the more rational thinking of men !!!

Does it exist at all? And how to understand it? This question is of particular interest to men !!!

What is female logic?

Whether women have logic is a purely masculine question. Logic as a concept exists in the world, so we can say that a woman is the same person as a man, and she has thoughts that are sometimes chaotic and do not fit into the male concept. Women do not always understand themselves. Why is that? Women's logic is a phenomenal way of thinking, in which the following are intertwined in a special way:
· emotions;
· the senses;
· Cunning;
· Intuition.
There are several concepts that look at feminine logic from different angles:
Social concept. A woman's way of thinking, which helps her to organize and equip her home life as useful as possible.
Biological concept. Hereditary transmission. Two X chromosomes are responsible for the transmission of female logic. If there is only one chromosome, then this is the owner of the usual (male) logic.
Feminist concept. Feminists believe that the concept of "female logic" was invented by misogynist men in order to show that male intelligence is many times superior to female.

Women's logic - myth or reality?

Is there a female logic - sociological studies do not give an unambiguous answer. But if great importance is attached to the study of this phenomenon, then it still has the right to exist, if only because there are women themselves. Since ancient times, both philosophers and writers have tried to comprehend the secrets of female logic. Some men are irritated by this incomprehensibility, others just shrug their shoulders and involuntarily admire ... and accept beautiful women as they are. Male and female logic - differences
Logic is a science formed in ancient times and assumes that if several people possess the same information, they will draw the same conclusions and see the correct relationships. It is believed that this logic is inherent in men who are naturally inclined towards rational thinking. Female logic can see such connections and phenomena in the information provided, which, in the male view, either do not matter or are not noticed at all by them.

The difference between female and male logic is remarkably and humorously reflected in aphorisms and sayings:
1. Male logic: I will find out - I will kill, female logic: even kill - I will find out!
2. What is the difference between male logic and female logic? Men are more correct, women are more interesting.
3. Women's logic: “Because I decided so! And why I decided so, I haven’t decided yet! ”.

In the eternal dispute over whose logic is better, there are no winners or losers. And, seriously, female logic and male logic are really different:
1. A woman trusts her feelings and intuition. A man is guided by reason and the facts provided.
2. Biological features of the structure of the brain. In women, when they are in an unusual situation, the frontal lobes of the brain, which are responsible for the manifestation of feelings and emotions, begin to work, in men, the processing centers for information coming from outside are immediately turned on.

Women's logic - psychology

Women's thinking and logic are based on the work of the left hemisphere of the brain, which is responsible for the development of creative abilities, these are more developed feelings and emotions, a heightened sixth sense. Psychologists believe that nature itself contributed to this way of thinking in women. A woman is physically weaker than men and therefore the advantages in a specific, different from masculine thinking help the weak half of humanity to feel danger and see connections and nuances that a man will never notice, or to get out “gracefully” from an argument and prove his case.
How does female logic work?

Women's logic is a special thinking, led only by a woman, based on her inferences.
1. The hormonal background, which often changes in the middle of the menstrual cycle and during critical days. The behavior of women and her actions becomes "illogical" from the point of view of men.
2. Flair or intuition. To the question "why did you do this?" A woman may not give an intelligible answer that suits a man. But life experience placed in the unconscious allows a woman to read non-verbal information much better than men: facial expressions, gestures and say with 100% accuracy, for example, whether a particular person can be trusted.
3. High emotionality and natural sacrifice. That which throws a woman into the arms of alcoholic men, losers. The desire to save is illogical for men, but it is peculiar to women.

How to understand female logic?

How can men understand what women want and why they behave "illogically"? To do this, you need to know the essence of female logic. A few simple recommendations for men who want to understand the course of women's thoughts or their logic:
· A woman thinks multidimensionally, but always means something concrete, not abstract (it is useful to find out what is concrete after all);
· In disputes, it is important for a woman not to prove statements, but to insist on her own;
· It is common for women to refute any opinions and even reject them, considering them completely meaningless (at the same time, she may not have her own exhaustive arguments on this score).
· The thinking of women is always tied to the result that suits them.